Disney Q3 2022 Earnings (DIS): Valuation Is Tricky, Hold

0
0


Valerie Loiseleux

Introduction

My thesis is that Disney’s (NYSE:DIS) valuation is difficult. Note that Disney’s fiscal 12 months ends within the fall whereas the fiscal years for Netflix (NFLX) and Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) finish in December.

The Numbers

Direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) streaming is an enormous a part of Disney’s future however they’re nonetheless shedding money on this space on an working revenue degree. Trailing-twelve-month (“TTM”) working revenue from DTC is $(3,171) million or $(2,541) million + $(1,679) million – $(1,049) million. This was on TTM income of $19,211 million or $14,651 million + $16,319 million – $11,759 million. The 3Q22 earnings report explains that the DTC working loss widened:

Direct-to-Consumer revenues for the quarter elevated 19% to $5.1 billion and working loss elevated $0.8 billion to $1.1 billion. The improve in working loss was because of a better loss at Disney+, decrease working revenue at Hulu and, to a lesser extent, a better loss at ESPN+. Lower outcomes at ESPN+ had been because of increased sports activities programming prices, partially offset by a rise in subscription income because of subscriber development.

Here are the DTC subscriber and month-to-month common income per person/subscriber (“ARPU”) numbers:

DTC Members & ARPU

DTC Members & ARPU (3Q22 earnings report)

Looking on the $19.2 billion TTM DTC income, it doesn’t appear to be damaged down by streaming supply however we are able to take into consideration the hypothetical annualized income numbers if sub development and ARPU had been to cease altering:

  • $7.1 billion Disney+ or $6.29*12*93.6 million
  • $0.8 billion Hotstar or $1.20*12*58.4 million
  • $1.2 billion ESPN+ or $4.55*12*22.8 million
  • $6.5 billion Hulu SVOD Only or $12.92*12*42.2 million
  • $4.2 billion Hulu Live TV + SVOD or $87.92*12*4 million

Without Hulu, the mixed Disney+ and ESPN+ annualized streaming income is $9.1 billion. By comparability, Netflix had 2Q22 income of $8 billion which is $32 billion annualized. Headlines concentrate on the truth that Disney+ has 152.1 million subs which isn’t far behind the 221 million we see at Netflix. However, income is the quantity that issues and Netflix has annualized income of $32 billion whereas Disney+ and ESPN+ have a mixed annualized income of simply $9.1 billion. Again, these 58.4 million Hotstar subs don’t do a lot to maneuver the needle on income so it’s apples and oranges once we discuss Disney+ and ESPN+ subs compared to Netflix subs. Netflix additionally had working losses again when their annualized income was below $10 billion and I consider Disney+ has technique to go earlier than the streaming economics enhance.

WBD had 2Q22 streaming income of $2.4 billion which is $9.6 billion annualized. Like Disney+, they’re shedding money on this space on an working revenue degree. Both Disney+ and WBD must be wonderful when it comes to working revenue from streaming as soon as they get to the income degree we see at Netflix but it surely may take a very long time for them to get to that time.

We have to know what Disney’s total free money stream (“FCF”) will seem like over the following decade with a purpose to decide what the corporate is value at the moment. I don’t see FCF damaged down by section however we do have section breakdowns for working revenue. From there, we now have to make some assumptions in regards to the FCF conversion for every section. Historically it was estimated that ESPN was half of the working revenue within the outdated “Cable Networks” section. Starting with the 2021 10-Ok, I don’t see the “Cable Networks” section damaged out however we now have some perception from what it regarded like previously. The apotheosis for working revenue from Cable Networks was reached in 2015 and 2016:

Cable Networks Operating Income

Cable Networks Operating Income (Author’s spreadsheet)

One of the issues I’ve is that working revenue from Cable Networks declined as a share of total working revenue from 2012 to 2018. The parks section is sort of like railroads the place their capex is persistently heavier than their depreciation. The studio section might be inconsistent such that FCF ranges are risky. Knowing that the Cable Networks working revenue has a better free money stream conversion than different segments, the shortage of working revenue development from the Cable Networks section is a priority.

The total TTM FCF is simply $1,205 million or $(317) million + $1,988 – $466 million. FCF was a lot increased up till 2018. 2019 FCF was decrease due to a $(6,599) million tax line within the money stream assertion tied to tax implications from the Fox spin-off. FCF remained low in 2020 and 2021 because the COVID pandemic created issues:

FCF

FCF (Author’s spreadsheet)

In the previous, linear ESPN was a prodigious contributor to FCF however now the quantities of the contributions from this section are obfuscated and it’s laborious to make predictions in regards to the future on this space. With the assistance of linear ESPN, FCF was north of $6 billion from 2013 to 2018 however it’s laborious to say how issues will look sooner or later as linear cable television subscriptions proceed to say no. In the quick run, I don’t see how ESPN+ could make up for FCF declines from linear ESPN. We know that the 3Q22 earnings report mentioned ESPN+ is presently working at a loss and the month-to-month ARPU is simply $4.55. The linear ESPN ARPU was nicely above this degree again within the day.

The 3Q22 10-Q reveals 1,823,057,777 shares excellent as of August third. Multiplying this by the August fifteenth share value of $124.26 provides us a market cap of $226.5 billion. The enterprise worth is about $51.9 billion greater than the market cap because of the truth that $13 billion in money solely partially offsets long-term debt of $46 billion, short-term debt of $5.6 billion, redeemable noncontrolling pursuits of $9.4 billion and different noncontrolling pursuits of $3.9 billion. WBD’s enterprise worth is about $51.5 billion increased than its market cap whereas Netflix has an enterprise worth that’s solely about $8.4 billion greater than its market cap. Seeing as WBD’s market cap is far lower than Disney’s, WBD has far more debt than Disney on a relative foundation however each WBD and Disney have extra debt than Netflix.

If Disney can get again to the 2018 FCF degree of $9.8 billion and preserve it there then the stock is affordable however there are lots of questions as to when that degree of FCF will occur once more frequently.

Long-term buyers have to pay attention and make determinations as to how legacy money cows like ESPN will subsidize future segments like DTC. Estimates additionally must be made as to when DTC will likely be money stream constructive and the way a lot vestigial FCF we’ll be seeing from linear ESPN at the moment.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here